by canadaguy on Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:37 pm
There is a reason why the phrase goes "Reduce, reuse, recycle." Note that recycle is the last choice.
The first choice should be to simply reduce the usage of things we don't need. This means not mining the raw materials for stuff we don't need, not manufacturing useless crap, and not burning more fossil fuel to make and transport it. Most families have so much crap in their houses, it's crazy.
Once you've done that, then you reuse. There's so many toys, clothes, car, applicances, and many other things out that could be supplied for years simply from the second-hand market without having to make new versions of them all.
Finally, when all that is done, you consider whether recycling the remainder makes sense. In some cases, however, *more* energy is burnt to recycle something than to make it from scratch. In that case recycling does more harm to the environment than good. Of course, if we do have to make something new, it should be designed to last a long time and be reusable, both as a whole, and, later in life, as parts.
So, yes, recycling is very often the wrong answer.